Showing posts with label Everglades fun. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Everglades fun. Show all posts

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Diatom of the Month – June 2017: Fragilaria synegrotesca

June 22, 2017 0
by Nick Schulte*

I think Fragilaria synegrotesca is a cute diatom. Although long and lanky (nothing wrong with that!), F. synegrotesca has an adorable, sometimes very slight, potbelly (Fig. 1). 

  
              
Fig. 1. a) Live frustules in a rosette colony (http://fcelter.fiu.edu/data/database/diatom/index.htm?species=3568) 
b) Fragilaria synegrotesca in valve view (Schulte 2014).

Now, some boring diatomist (e.g., me) might describe that little bump in the middle right as “a unilaterally expanded, hyaline central margin” and that’s accurate enough. But I also like to think of it as F. synegrotesca’s belly pooch. It brings to my mind the potbellies of seahorses, pigs, puppies and toddlers, and it seems very boop-able.


But let’s move past the physical attributes of this diatom, as the allure of this species is in its “actions”. Fragilaria synegrotesca has so far only been reported from karstic wetlands of the Caribbean and is most well-known from the Florida Everglades. In the Everglades, F. synegrotesca is nearly ubiquitous (Fig. 2), and it’s one of the five most abundant species in the calcareous periphyton mats in the nutrient-poor freshwater marshes (Gaiser et al. 2006). 

Fig. 2. Relative abundance (%) of F. synegrotesca across the Everglades (data from the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan Monitoring and Assessment Plan).


A major issue in Everglades restoration is getting the amounts of water and nutrients that enter this wetland right. Every winter/spring (the “dry season”), sloughs and inundated prairies often dry down. This happens more often and more severely now than in the “natural” pre-drainage state in many sites. But water managers (e.g., the South Florida Water Management District) can’t just send water through the marshes unless it’s “clean” (e.g., low in phosphorus), so as not to harm organisms that are adapted to this wetland’s low nutrient waters. So, Everglades restoration is between a bit of a rock and a hard place: we need to deliver more water to help the organisms that need high water (and can’t handle severe dry-down – e.g., many fish), but not at the expense of the organisms that can’t handle high nutrients in the water (e.g., some grasses and sedges).

Fragilaria synegrotesca is one of those organisms that doesn’t like to be dried out (Gottlieb et al. 2005, Lee et al. 2013), and its preference for being wet makes it a potentially “reliable indicator of the absence of periodic drying” in the ‘Glades (Gaiser et al. 2011). We can therefore use the abundance of this species (alongside other indicators) to measure the effects on biodiversity that potential reduced water flow might have upon different locations. This information can then inform decisions on how much water should be sent where and when – all key questions in Everglades restoration.
Unlike its freshwater-loving, high nutrient-hating buddies Brachysira microcephala, Encyonema evergladianum, and Mastogloia calcarea (let’s call them the “Fresh Diatoms of Belle Glades,” or “Freshies” for short), F. synegrotesca can also live comfortably in moderate phosphorus (P) concentrations and slightly salty water (“oligohaline”).

So, we can think of F. synegrotesca as that close friend that is too cool for us sometimes and likes to hang out with hipper, more indulgent folks.


And if this diatom is found in relatively high abundance in the absence of the Freshies, we know that area might be getting a little too phosphorus-y and/or salty than is normal. Now, there are some regions of the Everglades where finding F. synegrotescain enriched or salty places is normal, but by now we know which places are “normally” enriched/salty and which are not. So, if we see this species hanging out with the Salty Boys or the +P Posse in the good side of town (i.e., a normally freshwater, low nutrient place), we know something’s about to go down. In this way, I guess F. synegrotesca is also like that sweet suburban kid who gets caught up in the wrong crowd, and we’d rather see it back at home with the Freshies.

But here is some science to back up these potentially confusing analogies. In the Everglades, the total phosphorus (TP) optimum of F. synegrotesca is 270±202 µg P g-1periphtyon (Gaiser et al. 2006), and this species has been designated as an indicator of high TP (La Hée and Gaiser 2012). Compare that to oligotrophic, freshwater indicators (B. microcephala, E. evergladianum, and M. calcarea) that have a mean TP optimum of 159 µg g-1 (Gaiser et al. 2006). Our diatom of the month also has a salinity optimum and tolerance of 5±7.3 ppt (parts per thousand) – slightly higher than the Freshies (mean optimum across those 3 taxa = 2.9 ppt) (Wachnicka et al. 2010). Importantly, though, F. synegrotesca is generally not an indicator of a nutrient or salinity impacted site. Rather, its presence might indicate that a place is in limbo: it’s not too far gone, but it’s worse than we would expect if everything was OK. And F. synegrotesca alone doesn’t tell us much: rather, we have to look at the entire community of diatoms (and other algae and cyanobacteria) in order to make sense of the ecological impacts of modified nutrient levels and hydrology. So we use an “indicator community” analysis approach rather than “indicator species.”

As an example, in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) Monitoring and Assessment Program (MAP) scientists from the Gaiser and Trexler labs report on how ~150 sites across the Everglades (and their animals, plants, and algae in periphyton mats) are affected by nutrient enrichment. To do this, one of the best measurements of site alteration is a combined periphyton TP-diatom community composition metric (RECOVER 2014, see pages 6-33 – 6-39). They use a “stoplight” reporting technique: green means baseline (“success”) conditions (TP < 200 µg / g), yellow means “caution” (TP = 200-250 µg / g), and red means “altered” (TP > 250 µg / g) (Fig. 3). Fragilaria synegrotesca is one of the diatoms that can contribute to a “caution” designation if it’s found away from the Freshies.


Fig. 3. Condition status of sampling sites from 2011 using a periphtyon TP-diatom community metric (from RECOVER 2014; Fig. 6-17).

So, while F. synegrotesca may seem a bit pudgy, it is a mover and shaker of the diatom scene in the Everglades. In the Everglades, there is the potential for more widespread dry-downs, human-caused phosphorus enrichment in the Everglades interior (particularly in the northern Everglades and near canals), and for sea-level rise in the southern Everglades (pushing saltier, nutrient-enriched water into the freshwater inland regions). Fragilaria synegrotesca and its associated community are great tools to understand how such disturbances are affecting the nature of this wonderful and important wetland. The ongoing diligent scientific monitoring and analysis (e.g., by CERP MAP and the Florida Coastal Everglades Long Term Ecological Research program) allow us to understand things like a potbellied diatom that inform sustainable management and conservation of the entire ecosystem.







*Ph.D. student at the Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder and FIU Algae Research Lab alumnus


Gaiser, E. E., Childers, D. L., Jones, R. D., Richards, J. H., Scinto, L. J., & Trexler, J. C. (2006). Periphyton responses to eutrophication in the Florida Everglades: Crosssystem patterns of structural and compositional change. Limnology and Oceanography, 51(1part2), 617-630.

Gaiser, E. E., McCormick, P. V., Hagerthey, S. E., & Gottlieb, A. D. (2011). Landscape patterns of periphyton in the Florida Everglades. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 41(S1), 92-120.

Gottlieb, A., Richards, J., & Gaiser, E. (2005). Effects of desiccation duration on the community structure and nutrient retention of short and long-hydroperiod Everglades periphyton mats. Aquatic Botany, 82(2), 99-112.

Lee, S. S., Gaiser, E. E., & Trexler, J. C. (2013). Diatom-based models for inferring hydrology and periphyton abundance in a subtropical karstic wetland: Implications for ecosystem-scale bioassessment. Wetlands, 33(1), 157-173.

RECOVER (2014). System Status Report. Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, Restoration Coordination and Verification (RECOVER). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida, and South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA. http://141.232.10.32/pm/ssr_2014/cerp_ssr_2014.aspx

Schulte, N. (2014). Fragilaria synegrotesca. In Diatoms of the United States. Retrieved June 16, 2017, from http://westerndiatoms.colorado.edu/taxa/species/fragilaria_synegrotesca

Wachnicka, A., Gaiser, E., Collins, L., Frankovich, T., & Boyer, J. (2010). Distribution of diatoms and development of diatom-based models for inferring salinity and nutrient concentrations in Florida Bay and adjacent coastal wetlands of south Florida (USA). Estuaries and Coasts, 33(5), 1080-1098.

Friday, March 27, 2015

MARSH Madness 2015: Round of 64

March 27, 2015 0
I hope all your brackets are ready because it's game time for the Round of 64!


If you're running a bit behind and need some input on how to fill out your bracket: basically, just choose whichever organism you think has a greater effect on the Everglades in the head-to-head matchups. Once you determine who wins the first two matches, you'll then choose which organism out of those two teams wins in the next round, etc. You can determine winners based on a cost-benefit analysis that isn't necessarily limited by the two organisms' real-life interactions... or you can be more partial and pick your favorite.



After all, it's YOUR votes that matter. I've attached 4 polls to this page, one for each group in the bracket. You'll notice that the organisms are arranged by how they appear in the bracket (i.e. the organism underneath the first is playing the first organism, as it is throughout). You should vote multiple times on the poll (i.e. click multiple boxes): one vote per matchup (pair of organisms). Therefore, don't go voting for the alligator AND the killifish (they can't both win) and don't not vote for neither the panther or the woodrat! You should have 8 boxes checked per poll. Try not to be swayed by others' votes: I'm working on cloaking the results!


Voting is open until the end of the day Monday, so get your votes in before then. The Round of 32 will be open for all of Tuesday, Sweet Sixteen for Wednesday, Elite Eight for Thursday, and the Final Four for Friday. We will be holding First Friday that Friday, so we can discuss and analyze the upcoming championship game that will end on the following Monday.

And remember: if you don't vote, I have a hunch Periphyton 3 wins it all... Without further ado:

Round of 64: Vertebrates

Round of 64: Invasives

Round of 64: Primary Producers, etc.

Round of 64: Invertebrates


Bracket for reference:

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

MARSH Madness 2015

March 24, 2015 0
With the NCAA basketball tournament and "bracketology" in full swing, I figured we should see how the Everglades would match up in a tournament of champions: MarSh Madness! I admit that this is inspired by the brilliant Mammal March Madness, and it in no way compares to the breadth and depth with which those folks are simulating a mammal combat competition of probabilities! But let's just throw out a bracket of our favorite Everglades inhabitants.


Mammal March Madness has 4 categories, with the winners of each advancing to the semifinals. In the Everglades, I'm keeping with that, with categories for Vertebrates; Invertebrates; Primary Producers, etc. (etc. for a couple of add-ons, floc and soil microbes); and Invasives . I imagine that the vertebrates/invertebrates would advance based on abilities like trophic level, aggressiveness, adaptations, resilience, and "special skills". Primary producers, etc. would be categorized by the likes of competitiveness, colonization ability, primary production/carbon sequestration, and defense mechanisms. Invasives (including both animals and plants), by invasion ability, competition, and the attributes for their corresponding group. Rankings have been assigned fairly arbitrarily and stereotypically.

Now, obviously, in 'real life,' a panther would pretty much always win out against a woodrat. But think on the population/community scale on how well that species does as a whole (and beyond just eating vs. getting eaten). Likewise, eventually an alligator could pair up against sawgrass - how to choose, since they don't really compete against each other in nature? Again, think of 'ecosystem services' of each group (relativized), and make your choice!

I will NOT be running any fancy statistics or algorithms, tallying up each player's attributes, etc. Maybe next year. But this year will be mostly a name recognition and wish fulfillment exercise to see how the Everglades flora and fauna would match up. I'll have polls up for each round, and YOU can vote on who continues. If you don't vote, I have a hunch "Periphyton 3" may come out on top. Poll is forthcoming - use the meantime to populate your bracket. Let it begiiiin!


Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Everglades Songs: If the skeeters don't get him then the gators will

February 25, 2015 0
The end of low-mosquito camping season is nigh, and that's got me thinking about campfires and - a natural progression - campfire songs. And what better songs to sing in the Everglades than songs about the Everglades? In this series of posts I'll introduce you to some of my favorites, starting with:

"Everglades" by The Kingston Trio:



About a man who killed someone in a jealous fight and fled to the Everglades, where "a man can hide and never be found." Makes you think twice about doing some fieldwork out there. Turns out a judge ruled he acted in self defense, and he was hiding out for no reason (brings to mind "Dust On My Saddle" done by Seals & Crofts) - but he didn't know that (and his girl got tired of waiting - but, thankfully, that's not the focus of the song!). I'm thinking "if the skeeters [didn't] get him then the gators [did]." This is the song my dad told me I needed to learn before I came down here for my Master's - encouraging!

But it's catchy and darn true: calls to mind stories of the Ashley Gang led by John Ashley in the early 1900s (who killed his trapping partner up around Lake Okeechobee to start a life of gang crime with hideouts in the 'Glades).


But it also recalls vivid memories of fieldwork with insatiable mosquitoes and growling 'gators (okay, my 'gator stories are pretty lackluster, to be honest. Two field seasons and I'm much more afraid of the mosquitoes - the Trio should probably amend their lyrics to "If the skeeters don't get you....well, they always will"). More on the Ashley gang here and in Swamplife by FCE's own Laura Ogden!

Another fun lyric: "But now and then the natives would say /  They'd seen him running through the Everglades." Anyone reminded of the skunk (swamp) ape?

For the Kingston Trio, this song was released in 1960 and offered a bit of a tribute to the Everly Brothers (ending the song with "running through the trees from the Everlys"). I'm a big fan of the Kingston Trio: "Tom Dooley," "Greenback Dollar," "M. T. A.," "Sloop John B," and a host of just traditional-ish folk songs ("500 Miles," "Where Have All the Flowers Gone," "Lemon Tree"). Good campfire songs, many of them covered by another trio - any guesses?

How about you out there? How many of you have heard "Everglades" by the Trio? Waylon Jennings also did a rendition of it. Any favorites of theirs? Any other Everglades songs stick out (I have a few more I'll talk about later)? Let me know in the comments! (Your regularly scheduled algae program will return at some point.)

Full lyrics (and rough guitar chords, for those needing some inspiration around the campfire):


(D)                                              (A) 
He was born and raised around Jacksonville
(D)
A nice young man not the kind to kill
(G)
But a jealous fight and a flashing blade
(A) (D)
Sent him on a run through the Everglades
(A) (D)
Running like a dog through the Everglades

Now the posse went in and they came back out
They said he'll die and there ain't no doubt
It's an eye for an eye so the debt is paid
He won't last long in the Everglades
A man can't live in the Everglades

(G) (A)
Where a man can hide and never be found
(G) (D)
And have no fear of the bayin' hound
(D) (G)
But he'd better keep 'er movin' and don't stand still
(A) (D)
If the 'skeeters don't get him then the gators will

(D) (G) (A7) (D) (G) (A7)

Now the years went by and his girl was wed
His family gave him up for dead
But now and then the natives would say
They'd seen him running through the Everglades
Runnin' like a dog through the Everglades

Now he never heard the news on the radio
He was deep in the glades he'll never know
His runnin' and hide'n didn't make much sense
For the jury had ruled it was self defense
Runnin' like a dog through the Everglades

End: Runnin' like a dog through the Everglades
Skippin' like a dog through the slimy bog
Runnin' through the trees from the Everly's